I’m not usually slow to understand, but I’ve just been forced to think hard about what I am missing.
I am under the impression that we are deeply in the economic mire, and that everyone is grasping at straws to try and find some savings from their budget simply to break even, let alone contribute to the £20bn savings required to offset the growing pressures of the demographic challenge, most of which comes from increasing demand of more people needing to manage their chronic condition for a longer time.
I am also still of a mind to think that the NHS remains firmly wedded to the aims of improving patient experience, improving quality outcomes, and helping people to enjoy a greater sense of wellbeing – that pithy little adage about years to life and life to years which still does it for me!
I keep seeing policy statements about localism, and devolved responsibility, and nudging closer to our partners in local authorities, and latching into their long-standing skills in commissioning. I keep reading how desperately we need to engender a spirit which thrives on innovation, and that we absolutely must find and plant the magic beans which will automatically sprout into widespread adoption of proven ideas. I keep hearing people talk about using technology more effectively. I keep working with clinicians who are regularly patted on the shoulder and told how important it is that they take a stronger lead in decision making, because, after all, they are the experts. I talk to experts on corporate governance and leadership, observing the profound wisdom that leaders need to balance effective processes, with good judgement and a dose of personal accountability.
But then, I read the topic headlines from the Department of Health, and I am confused. The last week or so, has seen 41 pages of detail preparing the transfer of public health to local authorities, 86 pages of command to Aspirant Foundation Trusts to demonstrate that they are sufficiently on the ball to look after themselves, plus goodness knows how many memoranda instructing doctors precisely how to configure their CCGs. Rank this alongside a staggering 4 pages of passing comment on the Whole System Demonstrator evidence of just what telecare and telehealth can achieve. Evidence from 6000 patients, supported by 240 GP practices, showing a 45% reduction in mortality, a 15% reduction in visits to A&E, a 20% reduction in emergency admissions and an 8% reduction in bed days.
These findings merely put substance behind the intuitively obvious: that technology is just as capable of changing our business models in healthcare as it has been for every other service industry. They suggest that we don’t need to wait another three years, for any more studying. We don’t need to have another document from the DH micromanaging innovation, or bemoaning lack of adoption.
I am sure I must have my priorities wrong somewhere. I still can’t reconcile why policy is measured in kilograms of report, when some of the best evidence for policy change appears to be defined by improved outcomes, more stable health and some pretty impressive efficiency numbers. Ah well!